|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
St Mary's
Church Almondsbury
|
|
||||
|
|
To know God, build up each
other as Christians, and proclaim Jesus Christ as Lord to our neighbours |
|
|||||
|
|
Home | Services | Mid-week | Children & Youth | Community | Groups | Who's
Who | Gallery | Links | Find Us |
|
|||||
|
|
THEOLOGY 1: How can Jesus be divine and human? A summary of the talk given by
Rev John Hadley; the first in our series entitled ÒTheology for the Layman /
LaywomanÓ. |
|
|||||
|
|
Obviously, nothing could be more utterly
different than God and humanity – so
how could the two possibly come together in one person? Council of Chalcedon – doctrine of the
two natures of Christ – seems
so artificial; based on a static model that stems from later Greek philosophy Apollinaris rejected this picture,
saying that in Christ the divine Word took the place of ordinary humanity:
but was rejected as a heretic How can we find a more helpful picture? Are God and humanity really so utterly
different? (1)
God. Phil. 2.6, wrongly translated
as e.g. Òdid not snatch at equality with GodÓ but what it actually says is oukh
harpagmon hegesato to einai
isa Theou: (literally Ònot a snatching he thought being
equal
with GodÓ, that is Òhe did not think (that)
being equal with God (was) (a
matter of) snatching/grasping..... Ò..... but he
emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, becoming in the likeness of
humans...Ó In other words,
divinity does not involve snatching, standing on a pedestal, being superior: on the
contrary, divinity involves self-emptying, humility, giving oneÕs self away. Christ was not less
divine by becoming human: on the contrary, that is how he showed his
divinity. And this is not an
isolated text: throughout the gospels, Jesus rejects the model of ÒSon of GodÓ
which involves power, difference, superiority: and accepts only that of
self-giving love (cf the Temptations, PeterÕs confession, and all the sayings
about giving up oneÕs life in order to find it, taking up oneÕs cross etc
etc). It is because he is willing to go all
the way to the cross that he is truly divine: only so can he embody God who
is the God of love. (The dispute over the
unwarranted phrase Òand the SonÓ (filioque, which the Western
church added to the Nicene Creed, is much more than a quibble about words,
because, with this addition, Jesus is left up there with God rather than down
here with us.) (2)
Humanity. Again, we assume that humanity is as different from God as
it could be. But Genesis 1 tells
us that men and women are made in the image of God Some theologians say that at the ÒFallÓ this divine image
was entirely lost; but this is not our experience. Divinity still lurks in our depths, and calls out,
beckons, sings to us – an experience we know as longing or yearning... ÒAnd so the yearning strong with which the soul doth long shall far out pass the power of human
telling...Ó Shakespeare in a couple
of his gloomier passages refers to ÒmanÓ as Òthis quintessence of dustÓ and
as a Òpoor, bare, forkÕd animalÓ; but in fact the very sadness of these
passages is itself a pointer to a world beyond the dust. The Oxford chemist and atheist Peter
Atkins maintains that the sciences are the only true indicators of reality:
the arts might have their place as a pleasing escape from reality, but they
are not serious academic disciplines.
Whereas I would maintain it is
the arts which, intentionally or otherwise, constantly transfigure the
merely material and point us to the spiritual reality of God. Thus a sculptor can take a familiar
shape and show us in it something we have never seen before; painters can
astonish us, with the synergy of their subject and their materials, by making
the mundane beautiful; and a musical genius like Mozart can use the simplest
combinations of notes to take us into a different world. If Atkins is right, of course, all
this remains an irrelevant distraction: but for me it is evidence (?) of the
hidden divinity which every so often breaks out Òlike shining from shook foilÓ
as Gerard Manley Hopkins puts it. And in Christ, the Son
of Man, the Second Adam, we see someone in whom our calling to divinity has
been realised. The more human we
are, the more divine we become.
Those who have tried, for political or even religious ends, to Òquench
the spiritÓ, to suppress the divinity in humans – ShakespeareÕs
Malvolio, DickensÕ Mr Gradgrind, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, the Taliban (donÕt
have fun, donÕt enjoy, donÕt embellish, donÕt laugh, donÕt sing) – are
on a horrific but in the end a doomed enterprise: the cakes and ale will
always reassert themselves.
Perhaps this is why the Òsin against the Holy SpiritÓ is for Jesus the
ultimate blasphemy. (3)
I
have described a God whose divinity is known not in aloof grandeur but in
self-giving love; and a humanity which is at its truest when it is unearthing
divinity in its heart. Far from
being polar opposites, God and humanity constantly reach out to one another
and yearn to be at one. The New
Testament is full of language along these lines: the voices from heaven, the
prayers of Jesus, and PaulÕs astonishing language of reconciliation: Òin Christ God was reconciling the
world to himself... for our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so
that in him we might become the righteousness of GodÓ (2 Cor. 5.19,21). And it is good that at
the very heart of the Bible lie those few pages of mysterious and passionate
yearning which we call the Song of Songs. The coming together of God and humanity in Christ is not
an intractable proposition or a complicated diagram, leading to a very
unconvincing piece of psychology (how could someone with two natures really
be one of us?), but a love story; one which ends, not with God grudgingly ÒadoptingÓ
us his children again once Jesus has made a suitable sacrifice for us: but
with Christ welcoming us as sharers of his sonship, of his divine humanity,
in what he calls Òthe Kingdom of GodÓ. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Contact
the Church Office Rev. Philip W. Rowe, Vicar of Almondsbury and
Olveston with Aust |
Email the Website Administrator |
|
||||